The Administrative Court of the Canton of Bern has rejected an appeal against the removal of parking spaces in the Lorraine district. This decision paves the way for the creation of a new shared space zone. Local residents and businesses had filed the appeal, arguing that losing parking would create difficulties. The court ruled that the measure is proportionate and necessary for urban development.
Key Takeaways
- Bern's Administrative Court rejected appeals against parking space removal in Lorraine.
- Seven parking spaces will be converted or eliminated for a shared space zone.
- The court found the measure proportionate and beneficial for traffic safety and public space.
- Appellants cited concerns about parking shortages and financial impact on businesses.
- The decision supports urban planning efforts to enhance pedestrian and cyclist areas.
Court Affirms Parking Space Conversion Plan
The city of Bern plans to establish a shared space zone in the Lorraine district. This initiative requires the removal of several car parking spaces. Specifically, four of the seven existing parking spots will be eliminated entirely. The remaining three will be repurposed as bicycle parking spaces.
A group of residents and local business owners challenged this plan. They submitted an appeal, expressing concerns about the impact of these changes. However, the Administrative Court of the Canton of Bern has now dismissed their appeal, upholding the city's decision.
"The court found the removal of parking spaces to be a proportionate measure. It is essential for creating much-needed bicycle parking in high-traffic areas and resolving existing visibility issues."
Key Numbers
- 7 car parking spaces affected.
- 4 spaces will be removed completely.
- 3 spaces will be converted into bicycle parking.
- The court found the overall impact on 88 existing parking spots in the area to be minimal.
Arguments Against Parking Removal
The appellants argued that removing the parking spaces would be unreasonable for both residents and local businesses. They claimed it would worsen the already existing parking shortage in the area. This, they contended, would deter potential customers, leading to financial losses for businesses.
Furthermore, they suggested that fewer parking options would increase 'search traffic' within the district. This refers to vehicles driving around looking for available parking, which can lead to more congestion and pollution. The appellants believed these factors would negatively affect the quality of life and economic viability of the Lorraine district.
Understanding Shared Space Zones
A shared space zone is an urban design concept. It reduces the separation between pedestrians, cyclists, and vehicles. The goal is to improve safety and the quality of public spaces. These zones often feature lower speed limits, fewer traffic signs, and sometimes the removal of traditional curbs. This encourages all road users to be more aware of each other. The aim is to create a more harmonious and accessible urban environment.
Court's Justification for Its Decision
The Administrative Court rejected the arguments presented by the residents and business owners. The court deemed the removal of parking spaces as proportionate and justified. It stated that the measure is suitable and necessary.
One primary reason cited was the need to create adequate bicycle parking. These new bicycle spots will be in areas with high foot traffic. This addresses a demand for more sustainable transport options. Additionally, the court noted that the changes would help resolve existing visibility problems, making the area safer for all users.
Traffic Safety and Urban Quality
The court emphasized that both the shared space zone and the related parking space reduction are legally sound. It considered both measures as integral parts of a coherent strategy. This strategy aims to improve traffic safety and enhance the overall quality of public spaces in the city. The court's decision supports the city's broader urban development goals.
According to the court's judgment, which was reviewed by 20 Minuten, the Lorraine district and its side streets still have sufficient parking. The ruling highlighted that only seven of the total 88 car parking spaces in the immediate vicinity would be affected. Therefore, the court concluded that enough parking would remain available on Lorrainestrasse, in adjacent streets, and along Nordring.
Previous Rulings and Future Prospects
This is not the first time the appeal against the parking space removal has been dismissed. In 2024, the government administrator for Bern-Mittelland also rejected a similar complaint. The current ruling by the Administrative Court reinforces the earlier decision.
The current judgment from the Administrative Court can still be appealed further. The appellants have the option to take their case to the Federal Supreme Court. This means the legal process may not be entirely concluded. However, for now, the city's plan to proceed with the shared space zone and parking changes stands.
Impact on Urban Mobility
The decision reflects a broader trend in urban planning. Many cities are moving towards reducing car dependency and prioritizing sustainable transportation. By converting car parking into bicycle parking and creating shared spaces, Bern aims to make its urban areas more pedestrian and cycle-friendly. This aligns with goals of reducing traffic, improving air quality, and enhancing public life.
Such changes often spark debate between different groups. Car owners and local businesses may fear inconvenience and economic impact. Meanwhile, cyclists, pedestrians, and environmental advocates often welcome measures that promote active travel and greener cities. The Bern ruling illustrates the legal framework supporting these urban transformations.